Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 8, 2019, 12:09:58 PM (6 years ago)
Author:
[email protected]
Message:

Fix some typos in comments.

Not reviewed.

  • dfg/DFGIntegerRangeOptimizationPhase.cpp:
File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • trunk/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGIntegerRangeOptimizationPhase.cpp

    r239595 r239734  
    10441044        // We merge two lists by merging each relationship in one list with each relationship
    10451045        // in the other list. Merging two relationships will yield a relationship list; as with
    1046         // all such lists it is an intersction. Merging relationships over different variables
     1046        // all such lists it is an intersection. Merging relationships over different variables
    10471047        // always yields the empty list (i.e. TOP). This merge style is sound because if we
    10481048        // have:
     
    10861086        // when between the current relationshipsAtHead and the relationships being propagated
    10871087        // from a predecessor ensures monotonicity by converting disagreements into one of a
    1088         // small set of "general" relationships. There are 12 such relationshis, plus TOP. See
     1088        // small set of "general" relationships. There are 12 such relationships, plus TOP. See
    10891089        // the comment above Relationship::merge() for details.
    10901090        bool changed = true;
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.