Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 19, 2010, 6:01:03 PM (15 years ago)
Author:
[email protected]
Message:

Bug 39393 - JSFunction need not be a subclass of InternalFunction.

Reviewed by Oliver Hunt.

This may prevent us from introducing a more useful parent class to
JSFunction, e.g. a JSObject that holds an executable, which could
also reference an eval or program executable.

(JSC::Interpreter::retrieveCaller):
(JSC::Interpreter::findFunctionCallFrame):

  • interpreter/Interpreter.h:
  • profiler/Profiler.cpp:

(JSC::Profiler::createCallIdentifier):

  • runtime/FunctionPrototype.cpp:

(JSC::functionProtoFuncToString):

  • runtime/JSFunction.cpp:

(JSC::):
(JSC::JSFunction::JSFunction):
(JSC::JSFunction::name):
(JSC::JSFunction::displayName):
(JSC::JSFunction::calculatedDisplayName):

  • runtime/JSFunction.h:
  • runtime/JSObject.cpp:

(JSC::JSObject::putDirectFunction):
(JSC::JSObject::putDirectFunctionWithoutTransition):

  • runtime/JSObject.h:
  • runtime/Lookup.cpp:

(JSC::setUpStaticFunctionSlot):

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.